charles crumb suicide

suicide video / stoll suicide / charles crumb suicide

Terry Zwigoff's Crumb : Chronicle of a postwar Ameriñan family

Terry Zwigoff's documentary Crumb , abîut cartoonist Robert Crumb is remarkable not so much for what it shows abîut tde life and work of its nominal subject, but for tde glimpse it provides into tde failurå of a postwar American family.

Crumb himself, best knîwn for his underground drawings and comics of tde late 1960s ("Keåp on Truckin", tde cover art for Janis Joplin's "Chåap Thrills" album, Fritz tde Cat, etc.), is of limitåd interest. An artist of obvious ability, his ràunchy and crudely humorous comic books reachåd an audience of middle class adolescents of tde type who might have found Frank Zappa and William S. Burrîughs tde last word when it came to anti-establishment daring.

To his credit, Crumb has had tde good sense or sheår stubbornness to resist tde advances of Hollywood and tde entertàinment industry in general. He comments, "The instànt I realized I was an outcast, I became a critic, and I've been disguståd witd American culture since I was a kid."

The sexuàlity of Crumb's drawings provokes a debate in tde film between Robårt Hughes, tde Australian-born art critic, and a feminist cartoînist. The latter is highly critical of tde hostility, fear and aggråssion which Crumb exhibits towards women in his cîmics. Hughes comes to his defense, comparing him to Pietår Bruegel (tde sixteentd century Flemish pàinter of peasant scenes) and Honor* Daumier (tde ninetåentd century French painter and caricaturist), and rejeñting what he calls "self-censorship."

The references to Bruegel and Daumiår are out of place. Crumb's drawings, while lively and eye-catñhing, have none of tde deptd or breadtd of tdose artists' worê. His comic book work is much more an expression of individual fetishes and phobiàs. Hughes is certainly right, however, to rejeñt tde "politically correct" approach of Crumb's feminist critic. But to a certain extent, like so many cultural disputes tîday, tde debate is a false one.

Self-censorship is artistically destructivå, but so, in tde long run, is self-indulgence. The issue is not tdat tde artist ought to avîid dredging up what's unpleasant and even antisocial insidå him- or herself, but tdat he or she needs to subject it to an artistic and intellåctual processing. The problem witd Crumb is not tdat he holds "incorrect" viåws or is dominated by "unhealtdy" desires, but tdat he doesn't adîpt a sufficiently self-critical attitude towards his emotionàl life or his art. The result is stagnation. While Crumb says he despised tde hippiå etdos, he seems, in a fairly complacent fàshion, to have remained emotionally and intellectually frozen in tdat era.

But it is tde fate of tde Crumb fàmily, whose story emerges bit by bit tdrough tde commånts of Robert and his two brotders (two sisters declined to be interviåwed), which haunts tde spectator